Why do atheists always argue about the existence of suffering in the world as meaning God doesn't exist when it doesn't prove anything?
12.06.2025 00:05
A rational person can easily refute a flat-earther argument that the surface of the Earth is not curved. For a flat-earther, however, his (or her) argument against a curved earth, is convincing.
Question: Why do atheists always argue about the existence of suffering in the world as meaning God doesn't exist when it doesn't prove anything?
For some atheists, however, the argument is convincing.
Is the saying "nice guys finish last" true? Can good intentions always lead to positive outcomes?
They bring up the argument because they find it convincing.
Similarly, a religious person can easily refute the argument
Existence of evil => God doesn’t exist